Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:23

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Nick Jonas Set As KISS Singer Paul Stanley In STX Movie ‘Shout It Out Loud’ - Deadline
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Wall Street warns Trump aides the GOP tax bill could jolt bond markets - The Washington Post
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Get ready for June’s strawberry moon - WTOP
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Are Hailee Steinfeld & Josh Allen getting married on May 31? - Buffalo Rumblings
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
News & Notes: John Harbaugh on Why Jon Gruden Observed OTAs - Baltimore Ravens
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
A Year Out From the World Cup, the USMNT Looks Unprepared to Defend Home Turf - The Ringer
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
15,000 Light-Years Away, Something Is Blinking – And It Might Rewrite Physics - SciTechDaily